Write About Everything

How to File a Medical Malpractice Case

A malpractice instance is when medical professionals fail to treat a patient according with accepted standards of care. For instance, if an orthopedic surgeon is negligent during surgery, which causes damage to the nerves in the femoral area, it could be considered medical malpractice.

Duty of care

The doctor-patient relationship has the duty of care all medical professionals must fulfill in their job. This means taking reasonable steps to prevent injury or to cure a patient’s illness. The doctor must also inform the patient of any potential risks associated with a particular treatment or procedure. A doctor who fails to warn the patient of risks that are known to the profession could be liable for malpractice law firms.

A medical professional who violates their duty of caring is accountable for negligence and is required to pay damages to the plaintiff. This element of the case must be proven by showing that the defendant’s conduct, or lack thereof, fell below the standard of the way other medical professionals perform in similar situations. This is usually demonstrated through expert testimony.

A medical expert familiar with the pertinent practices and kinds of tests that should be performed to diagnose an illness could testify the defendant’s actions violated the standard of care. They can also explain in simple terms to a juror the reason the standard was not followed.

Not all medical experts are qualified to handle malpractice lawsuits cases, therefore an experienced attorney should be able to locate and work with the appropriate experts. In the case of complex cases, it may be necessary for the expert to provide detailed reports and be able to give evidence in court.

Breach of duty

Determining the standard of care and proving that the medical professional breached it is the main element in all malpractice cases. This is typically done by obtaining expert evidence from doctors with the same training, experience and knowledge as the alleged negligent doctor.

The standards of care are basically what other medical professionals in your situation would offer to treat you. Doctors are required by their patients to treat them with caution and in a sensible manner. This duty of care extends to their loved ones. It doesn’t mean medical professionals are not required to be good samaritans outside the hospital.

When the medical professional breaches their duty of care and you’re injured, they are accountable for the injuries you sustain. The plaintiff must also show that the breach directly led to the injury. For instance, if the defendant surgeon misreads their patient’s chart and then operates on the wrong leg and causes an injury, it’s likely that they were negligent.

It could be difficult to prove the reason for your injury. For instance, in the case where an surgical sponge is left behind following a gallbladder surgery, it’s hard to demonstrate that the patient’s injuries resulted directly from the procedure.

Causation

A doctor may be held liable for malpractice only if the patient can prove that the doctor’s negligence directly led to injury. This is known as “cause”. It is important to note that a negative consequence of an operation is not always medical malpractice. The plaintiff must prove that the doctor deviated from the standard of care in similar cases.

A doctor is obliged to inform patients of all risks and potential outcomes as well as the likelihood of success of a procedure. If a patient has not been adequately informed of the risks, they could have decided to opt out of the procedure, and instead choose an alternative. This is known as the duty of informed consent.

The legal system for handling medical malpractice cases developed from English common law in the 19th century. It is governed by various state statutes and the decisions of courts.

The procedure of suing a doctor involves filing an official complaint, or summons in a state court. This document outlines the claimed wrongs and seeks compensation for injuries caused by a physician’s actions. The lawyer of the plaintiff must schedule an oath-taking deposition with the doctor who is defendant that gives the plaintiff an opportunity to give testimony. The deposition will be recorded and used as evidence in the trial.

Damages

A patient who believes a doctor has committed medical malpractice may pursue an action before a court. A plaintiff must show that there are four elements that constitute an action for malpractice that is valid: a legal obligation to act within the rules of the profession and a breach of duty, an injury resulting by this breach and damages that may be reasonablely connected to the injuries.

Expert testimony is required in medical malpractice cases. The lawyer for the defendant will typically engage in discovery where the parties ask for written interrogatories as well as requests for documents. These are queries and requests for evidence that the opposing side must answer under oath. This can be a lengthy and drawn-out process, and both sides will have experts testify.

The plaintiff also has to prove that the negligence caused significant damages. It could be expensive to pursue a malpractice claim. If the damages are small and the case is not a big one, it may not be worth the effort to bring a lawsuit. The amount of damages must also be greater than the expense to file the lawsuit. Therefore, it is essential that the patient consults an Board Certified legal malpractice lawyer before bringing a lawsuit. After an investigation, either the losing party or the winning party can appeal the decision of the lower court. During an appeal the higher court will review the evidence and determine if the lower court committed any mistakes in fact or law.