Write About Everything

Dear Dr. Myint,

We’re happy to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and 更年期（及び更年期　サプリ） will be formally accepted for publication as soon as it meets all excellent technical requirements.

Inside one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript shall be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an environment friendly course of, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click on the ‘Replace My Data’ link at the top of the page, and double test that your person info is up-to-date. You probably have any billing related questions, please contact our Creator Billing division straight at gro.solp@gnillibrohtua.

If your establishment or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to assist maximize its impact. If they’ll be getting ready press supplies, please inform our press staff as quickly as possible — no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain below strict press embargo until 2 pm Japanese Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact gro.solp@sserpeno.

Kind regards,

Walid Kamal Abdelbasset, Ph.D.

Educational Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Feedback (optional):

Reviewers’ comments:

Reviewer’s Responses to Questions

Comments to the Creator

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your feedback raised in a previous round of assessment and you’re feeling that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, chances are you’ll point out that right here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement within the “Confidential to Editor” part, and submit your “Accept” suggestion.

Reviewer #1: All feedback have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All feedback have been addressed

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the information assist the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific analysis with data that helps the conclusions. Experiments must have been performed rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions should be drawn appropriately based on the information introduced.

3. Has the statistical evaluation been carried out appropriately and rigorously?

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings of their manuscript totally available?

The PLOS Information policy requires authors to make all knowledge underlying the findings described of their manuscript fully out there with out restriction, with uncommon exception (please seek advice from the information Availability Assertion within the manuscript PDF file). The information needs to be offered as a part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, along with summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be obtainable. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data-e.g. participant privateness or use of data from a 3rd celebration-these must be specified.

5. Is the manuscript offered in an intelligible trend and written in commonplace English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles should be clear, right, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please word any particular errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

6. Evaluation Feedback to the Writer

Please use the house provided to clarify your answers to the questions above. You might also embrace extra comments for the author, together with issues about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please add your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Paper titled (Results of an equol-containing supplement on superior glycation end merchandise, visceral fats and climacteric signs in postmenopausal girls: A randomized managed trial) by Yoshikata et al. was improved and that i recoomedn acceptance of the present kind.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the choice to publish the peer evaluate history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer assessment and any attached files.

For those who choose “no”, your identification will remain nameless but your evaluate should still be made public.

Do you want your id to be public for this peer evaluation? For details about this selection, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.