Write About Everything

Today, I will be diving right into the world of fake smart devices by examining a Galaxy S22 Ultra clone I bought from AliExpress. Valued at simply $123 for the 256GB design with 8GB of RAM, this phone is, of program, not an authentic Samsung tool.

First Impacts

The phone is marketed with excellent specs, including 16-megapixel cams, a 6,800 mAh battery, and a 10-core MediaTek 6889 processor. It also assures an attribute referred to as “Rubik’s Cube modern technology.” Intrigued by these cases, I bought one to see for myself. Who wouldn’t want a phone with Rubik’s Cube modern technology?

Upon arrival, the phone can be found in an ordinary black box labeled S22 Ultra. Inside, I located the phone, a flimsy S Pen that does not fit inside the tool, a clear case, a spare display protector, a lightweight and dubious battery charger, a USB-C cable television, earphones, a SIM adapter, and a manual. The inclusion of an earphone jack was a pleasurable surprise, but the overstated claim of 32 million electronic cameras was plainly simply a translation error– or was it?

Checking the Specifications

Turning the phone on, I headed straight to the “About Phone” section. It showed an S22 Ultra with 8GB of RAM, 256GB of storage, a 10-core Snapdragon processor, and Android 11. Having run into fake specifications in various other Chinese phones, I was hesitant. My experience with a fake apple ipad review iphone 13 Pro duplicate, where every spec was fake, taught me not to trust fund appearances.

Prior to diving deeper, I chose to check the fingerprint scanner. Setting it up was straightforward, but when it involved unlocking the phone, any type of finger– or also a knuckle– worked. It came to be clear that the phone did not have an actual finger print scanner; it simply bypassed the lock screen when you touched the marked location.

Analyzing Pre-installed Apps

I was curious concerning the pre-installed applications like Facebook, Netflix, and TikTok. Were they genuine? A strange message in the TikTok settings claiming the app would not infringe on individual interests increased my suspicions. After validating with a friend making use of a real Galaxy S22 Ultra, I verified the message was genuine. However, attempting to upgrade TikTok via an APK data stopped working, making me wary of its legitimacy.

The sketchiness really did not end there. The internet browser application, disguised as Google Chrome, requested authorizations to take photos, record sound, and accessibility get in touches with. Declining these consents crashed the app, more sealing my skepticism.

Revealing the Reality

Figured out to find the truth, I utilized Quick Faster way Manufacturer to discover concealed applications. It really did not take long to find an application by King Send out Time called “Tool Details.” Opening it exposed the real specifications: a MediaTek MT-6580 processor from 2016, Android 8.1, a 480p display, 1GB of RAM, and 8GB of storage– far from the promoted specs.

Another app, “Switch Application” by KST, allowed me to change the tool’s shown specs. This app is utilized by fraudsters to phony the phone’s specifications, making it show up much more effective than it is. With a couple of taps, I changed the phone into an “S40 Ultra” with ridiculous specs, though these changes were simply aesthetic.

Exploring Better

Digging much deeper, I discovered that the phone’s IMEI number matched that of a real Galaxy S22 Ultra, indicating they most likely cloned a reputable IMEI. This deception included the hardware; opening up the phone revealed that three of the four cameras were fake. The actual battery capacity was around 2,200 mAh, a mere 32% of the promoted 6,800 mAh.

Reassembly and Final thought

After documenting the real specs and taking a great appearance inside, I reassembled the phone. In spite of its outside appearance, this tool is a testimony to deceptive marketing and shady organization techniques. It’s a modern-day item of e-waste, packaged with lies.

In an attempt to fix this, I spoke to the vendor, apple ipad review supplying proof of the phone’s deceitful nature. Nevertheless, they continued to be uncooperative. I will certainly proceed with getting a reimbursement since no fraudster deserves my money.

If you enjoyed this, struck the subscribe switch and examine out the scam-busting playlist for more videos like this. If you’re in the market for used tools, see my on-line shop linked in the summary.

Valued at simply $123 for the 256GB design with 8GB of RAM, this phone is, of training course, not an authentic Samsung gadget. Upon arrival, the phone came in an ordinary black box classified S22 Ultra. Inside, I discovered the phone, a lightweight S Pen that doesn’t fit inside the tool, a clear situation, a spare screen protector, a light-weight and uncertain charger, a USB-C cable television, earphones, a SIM adapter, and a manual. Turning the phone on, I headed directly to the “Regarding Phone” section. Digging much deeper, I found that the phone’s IMEI number matched that of a genuine Galaxy S22 Ultra, suggesting they most likely duplicated a legit IMEI.