Write About Everything

How to File a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

In bringing a medical malpractice suit against a hospital or doctor must prove that the defendant acted in breach of his or her duty to patients. This could include medical and hospital records.

Our lawyers are adept at taking effective depositions of witnesses. They could be doctors, other medical professionals in private practice or work at a hospital or clinic.

Negligence

Patients are entitled to be treated with respect to certain standards when they visit a hospital, doctor, or health care professional. Unfortunately they aren’t always met or even violated. This can lead to devastating consequences.

When someone is injured or death because of a doctor’s negligence, they could pursue a lawsuit against the medical professional. To establish a case the injured person must establish four legal aspects that include breach of duty, breach of duty, damages and causation.

Malpractice is described as an act performed by doctors that goes against the norms of the medical profession and results in injury to the patient. It is a subset of tort law which covers civil violations that are not contraindicated by law or are criminal offenses.

Medical negligence is different from regular negligence because the injured party must show that the doctor knew or should have known that their actions would cause harm to prove malpractice, whereas normal negligence is not required. A surgeon who accidentally cuts or nicks the nerve or vein during surgery is guilty of negligence, but not negligence. This is because the doctor did not intend to harm anyone.

In the event of a medical malpractice lawsuit the defendant’s responsibility is to treat the patient according with the standard of care that a reasonably competent health professional with similar experience and education could provide in similar situations. The violation of this duty is a critical aspect because it proves that the alleged negligent behavior caused the injury.

Damages

In a case of malpractice damages are determined based on the losses you have suffered due to a doctor’s negligence. These can include both actual financial loss, such as the expense of medical treatment in the future as well as non-economic losses like pain and suffering.

To recover damages, you must show that the doctor breached a duty of care, that the doctor’s deviation from the norm resulted in injury, and that this injury had quantifiable monetary consequences. This is a difficult legal analysis that typically requires expert witness testimony.

Some of these losses are evident like when your doctor made an error that caused an infection or other medical complications that required additional treatment because of it. Some damage is more difficult to spot, such as when a doctor misdiagnoses your condition and you don’t receive the right treatment.

You may sue for wrongful deaths if your doctor’s negligence causes your death. In these claims, you are entitled to everything you would have received in a survival lawsuit and punitive damages.

In a majority of states, there are limits on what you can claim in a malpractice case. The caps differ from state to state and are usually applicable to both financial and other damages. Certain states also have rules that restrict the time it takes to make a claim.

Time Limits

As with all lawsuits, there are specific time frames that must be observed or the case will be barred. A malpractice lawsuit should generally be filed between two and six years after the malpractice occurred. The exact time frame is different for each state.

It is essential to speak with an attorney as soon as you can. The law firm will investigate to determine if there was malpractice and whether the case will be heard in court. This phase can last for weeks or even months.

Medical malpractice cases involve different laws than other types of cases, and typically, the statute of limitations is altered. In Pennsylvania, a patient has two years from the time when they first discovered the malpractice. This is called the discovery rule.

In other states the statute of limitations begins at the time the springhill malpractice law firm occurred. This can be an issue if the error doesn’t immediately cause symptoms. Imagine, for instance that a doctor has negligently left a foreign body in the patient’s body after surgery. The patient might not be aware of the foreign object until at least three years after surgery. In that situation, the statute of limitations might have started to run from the date of the surgery, not from the discovery of the error.

Expert Witnesses

Expert witnesses are frequently called upon to explain the facts in medical Pasadena Malpractice Attorney (Vimeo.Com) cases. A plaintiff’s expert witness will provide testimony regarding the doctor’s duty of taking care of the patient and the medical standards applicable to the region and specialty for doctors who has similar qualifications and abilities and the ways that the defendant deviated from those standards. The expert will discuss how the defendant’s departure directly caused the patient’s injury.

The defendant will hire an expert to counter the plaintiff’s expert, and offer their professional opinion about whether the doctor met the standards of care. The experts could disagree but the fact-finder will decide which expert is most credible.

It is recommended for the expert to continue working in the medical field as they are more informed about current practice. Jurors and judges typically believe that practicing professionals are more credible than experts whose only source of income is testimony in court.

It is also beneficial to get an expert witness that is specialized in the area of the legal malpractice. For example an expert in medical practice who is well versed in treating breast cancer can make an argument that is more convincing about the reason for the plaintiff’s injuries. A medical malpractice lawyer in Ocala knows which experts to ask.