Write About Everything

The Indonesian house of Representatives has passed the Revised Special Autonomy be active (UU Otsus) for Papua and West Papua. The basis is to tally up the take forward and welfare of the people upon Earth of Cendrawasih through optimizing the special autonomy fund. This amendment (Law) reforms to augmented oversee expand in Papua and prioritizes the rights of OAP (Indigenous Papuans), said Deputy Chairman of Commission II of the Indonesian home of Representatives Junimart Girsang to Media Indonesia, Friday (16/7). According to him, adulation for OAP is more important in this law. There is even one article that specifically respects OAP, as in Article 68A.

Read also: Paskalis Kossay calls the Special Autonomy work the Golden Bridge to a Prosperous and Independent Papua This article requires that in the context of synchronization, harmonization, evaluation, and coordination of the implementation of special autonomy and further in Papua, a special agency is formed which is directly liable to the president, chaired by the vice president and consisting of ministers. domestic affairs, the head of Bappenas, the minister of finance and one representative from each province in Papua, he explained. The PDIP politician in addition to said supplementary articles also established OAPs rights. The combination of further articles empowers OAP resources and conducts elections for the DPRK which are directly elected and forward appointments for 1/4 of the seats for OAP from the sum number of seats in DPRK, he explained. Overall, the Papua Special Autonomy play a part on your own has changes and additions, later 20 articles.

The second amendment made to feint Number 21 of 2001 includes amendments to 18 articles and two articles. The additional articles, namely Article 6A and Article 68A, fittingly that there are 20 articles. next three articles from the governments proposal, namely Articles 1, 34, and 76 and 15 articles external the governments proposal, namely Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 17, 20, and an financial credit of article 24 paragraph 1, articles 28, 36, 38, 56, 59, 68 and an balance of article 75, he concluded. Meanwhile, a member of the DPR from the PKB faction, Muhammad Fauzan Nurhuda Yusro, explained that the substance of the amendment to the Special Autonomy be in was more just about further explanation organization higher than the implementation of the special autonomy fund. In particular, the Chapter on Supervision, particularly Article 67, is not amended but is strengthened through Article 34 paragraph (14). Later on, the giving out of the paperwork of revenues in the framework of special autonomy as referred to in paragraph (3) letter b number 4 and number 5, letter e, and letter f will be carried out in a coordinated look with their respective authorities by ministries, non-ministerial management institutions, regional governments, DPR, DPD, the perfect Audit Agency, and state universities, he explained. A more detailed mechanism upon increase supervision, he said, would be regulated in a giving out Regulation (PP), and its preparation was plus consulted taking into consideration the DPR through the commission in charge.

The change, he continued, was based upon the evaluation results from the previous Otsus. That the governance of the special autonomy budget revenue raises many problems, including nonexistence of transparency, accountability, and deficiency of targeting. So the special autonomy funds are not enjoyed by the entire Papuan community, he said. He emphasized that the DPR and the government want Papua to be more radical to catch up. So similar to the division article, the DPR assesses from existing experience that the go ahead makes the region more forward looking in developing its region. see at West Papua now progressing, right, he explained. According to him, to revere the dignity and worth and guarantee the aspirations and claim of the original Papuan people, this bill reorganizes the affirmative policy in the Papuan Peoples Assembly (MRP) and the Papuan Peoples Assembly (MR Representative Council (DPRP). As regulated in Article 6, there is an further norm to highlight that DPRP members come from members elected in general elections once statutory provisions and appointed from Papuan native (OAP) elements, he explained.

The appointed DPRP must not arrive from a embassy party and accommodate 30% of its women. The members of the DPRP who are appointed are or one-fourth of the sum members of the DPRP who are elected in the general election next the provisions of the legislation. The term of office is five years and ends simultaneously similar to the term of office of the elected DPRP members. Then, almost further complex provisions in the region of the appointed members of the DPRP, it is regulated in the PP. The affirmation of the house of Representatives connection applies to the DPRP and applies to the district/city or DPRK level. The promise is the same as that of the DPRP. Only, in the normalization of this bill, it needs to be regulated in a surgically remove article. Therefore, the PKB Faction definitely taking into account the adjunct by inserting Article 6A to fiddle with the DPRK, he concluded.