Write About Everything

Motor Vehicle Litigation

If the liability is challenged in court, it becomes necessary to make a complaint. The defendant has the option to respond to the Complaint.

New York has a pure comparative negligence rule. This means that when a jury finds you to be at fault for an accident and you are found to be at fault, your damages will be reduced according to your percentage of blame. There is one exception to this rule: CPLR SS 1602 excludes owners of vehicles which are rented or leased by minors.

Duty of Care

In a case of negligence, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed an obligation of care to them. Nearly everyone owes this obligation to everyone else, but those who sit behind the wheel of a Bridgeport motor vehicle Accident Lawyer vehicle have a greater obligation to others in their area of activity. This includes ensuring that there are no accidents in west hollywood motor vehicle accident attorney vehicles.

Courtrooms compare an individual’s actions to what a typical individual would do in the same circumstances to establish what is reasonable standards of care. In the case of medical malpractice experts are often required. Experts with more experience in particular fields may be held to a greater standard of care.

A person’s breach of their duty of care may cause harm to a victim, or their property. The victim must prove that the defendant’s breach of their duty led to the injury and damages that they have suffered. The proof of causation is an essential aspect of any negligence case, and it involves looking at both the actual causes of the injury damages, as well as the causal cause of the injury or damage.

If a person is stopped at an intersection and fails to obey the stop sign, they could be struck by another vehicle. If their car is damaged they will be responsible for repairs. The real cause of a crash could be caused by a brick cut that develops into an infection.

Breach of Duty

A breach of duty by the defendant is the second element of negligence that needs to be proved to obtain compensation in a personal injury suit. A breach of duty occurs when the actions of a party who is at fault are not in line with what reasonable people would do in similar circumstances.

For instance, a physician has a variety of professional obligations to his patients that are governed by state law and licensing boards. Drivers are required to protect other motorists and pedestrians, as well as to adhere to traffic laws. Any driver who fails to adhere to this duty and causes an accident is accountable for the victim’s injuries.

A lawyer can rely on the “reasonable individuals” standard to show that there is a duty to be cautious and then show that defendant failed to meet this standard in his conduct. The jury will decide if the defendant complied with or did not meet the standard.

The plaintiff must also demonstrate that the breach by the defendant was the direct cause of the plaintiff’s injuries. It is more difficult to prove this than a breach of duty. For example the defendant could have been a motorist who ran a red light, however, the act wasn’t the proximate cause of your bicycle crash. The issue of causation is often challenged in crash cases by defendants.

Causation

In motor vehicle cases, the plaintiff has to establish a causal connection between the defendant’s breach of duty and the injuries. For instance, if a plaintiff suffered neck injuries as a result of an accident that involved rear-ends and his or her lawyer might argue that the collision was the cause of the injury. Other factors that are necessary in causing the collision such as being in a stationary vehicle are not culpable, and do not affect the jury’s decision of the liability.

For psychological injuries However, the connection between an act of negligence and an victim’s afflictions may be more difficult to establish. It may be the case that the plaintiff has a rocky past, has a bad relationship with their parents, or has abused alcohol or drugs.

If you have been in a serious motor vehicle accident it is essential to speak with an experienced attorney. The attorneys at Arnold & Clifford, LLP have years of experience representing clients in personal injury, commercial and business litigation and motor vehicle accident cases. Our lawyers have built working relationships with independent doctors in various specialties, as well as experts in computer simulations and reconstruction of accidents.

Damages

The damages that plaintiffs can seek in a sulphur springs motor vehicle accident lawyer vehicle case include both economic and non-economic damages. The first category of damages includes any monetary costs that are easily added to calculate a sum, such as medical expenses and lost wages, property repair, and even future financial losses like diminished earning capacity.

New York law also recognizes the right to seek non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life, which cannot be reduced to a dollar amount. These damages must be established through extensive evidence such as depositions from family members and friends of the plaintiff medical records, as well as other expert witness testimony.

In the event of multiple defendants, courts typically employ comparative fault rules to determine the amount of damages that must be divided between them. The jury must determine how much responsibility each defendant incurred in the accident and to then divide the total amount of damages by the percentage of blame. However, New York law 1602 exempts owners of vehicles from the rule of comparative negligence in the event of injuries suffered by drivers of trucks or cars. The analysis to determine whether the presumption of permissiveness is complex. Typically it is only a clear evidence that the owner denied permission to the driver to operate the vehicle will overcome the presumption.